I read the article () “Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions” (Pereira et al.) with great interest; however, I am left confused by the study and believe some issues must be discussed.
[…]
Comments on “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions”
AnY. Comments on “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions”. Clinics (Sao Paulo).. 2020;75:e2338. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e2338
An,Yongyu. Comments on “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions”. Clinics (Sao Paulo)., v. 75, e2338, Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e2338
An,Y. (2020). Comments on “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions”. Clinics (Sao Paulo).,75, e2338. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e2338
An,Yongyu. Comments on “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions”. Clinics (Sao Paulo). [online]. 2020, vol. 75, [cited 2020-12-03], e2338. Available from: <https://www.clinicsjournal.com/article/comments-on-evaluation-of-the-accuracy-of-mammography-ultrasound-and-magnetic-resonance-imaging-in-suspect-breast-lesions/>. ISSN 1807-5932. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e2338
Figure 1
Confidence (Naive and Rogan-Gladen) and credible (Bayesian) intervals for prevalence of COVID-19.
